If someone breaches us, they get ciphertext.
Employee survey encryption built for security review — not badge collecting.
Most security pages list badges. We don't have badges yet — we have an architecture designed so a breach yields nothing readable. This page is the threat model, the key custody design, and the data-handling facts, written for the person filling out the vendor assessment.
Illustrative breach-impact map: plaintext exists only in the respondent browser; infrastructure stores ciphertext; an attacker with full read access obtains opaque bytes.
No badges. A verifiable design instead.
InviziPoll does not currently hold SOC 2, ISO 27001, or a published third-party pen-test. Rather than imply otherwise, this page gives you the thing certifications summarize: the actual architecture, threat model, and data-handling facts, specific enough to check our claims against the design.
Everything here is written to be pasted into a vendor assessment. If a question isn't answered, and we'll answer it in writing.
What we claim
- Responses are encrypted client-side; servers persist ciphertext only
- Decryption keys are generated and held by the customer
- Respondent identity, IP, and device are never persisted on ballot/respondent flows
What we don't claim
- Certifications we haven't earned (no SOC 2 or ISO badge yet)
- "Zero risk" (residual risks are listed below, not hidden)
- That cryptography fixes bad questionnaire design (it can't)
Threat model
The threat ledger
Each scenario below states plainly what an attacker obtains. Green rows are defeated by architecture; amber rows are residual risks we expect you to evaluate, and that no vendor can honestly claim away.
Full database compromise
Attacker exfiltrates the production responses store.
Responses are encrypted in the respondent's browser with the workspace public key. The database never receives plaintext to leak.
Backup / snapshot theft
Offsite backups or DB snapshots are stolen.
Backups are byte-copies of ciphertext at rest. There is no separate plaintext tier to back up.
Malicious insider (root)
An InviziPoll employee with root access reads production data.
Operators hold no decryption keys. Insider access is architecturally equivalent to a breach: opaque bytes.
Legal compulsion
A subpoena or court order demands respondent answers.
We can only produce what we possess. We cannot decrypt what we are compelled to hand over.
Network interception
TLS is terminated or downgraded in transit.
The response is already envelope-encrypted before it enters the TLS tunnel: transport is a second layer, not the only one.
Compromised admin device
Malware on a workspace admin's machine where keys live.
Blast radius is that workspace's aggregates; individual responses stay k-anonymity-gated. Endpoint hygiene remains your control, not ours.
Identifiable question wording
A poll author asks "What's your desk number?"
Cryptography cannot fix a question that de-anonymizes by design. Pair the tool with questionnaire review (see our Anonymity page).
Cryptography & key custody
The primitives, named, and who holds the keys
No proprietary crypto, no vague “bank-grade encryption.” Standard, named primitives and a custody model where losing your key means losing decryption, by design.
Primitives
Every response is envelope-encrypted client-side before submission.
- Key encapsulation
- ML-KEM-768
FIPS 203: post-quantum KEM, hybridized with X25519.
- Signatures
- ML-DSA-65
FIPS 204: envelope and admin signing without respondent identification.
- Payload cipher
- AES-256-GCM
Per-response ephemeral key, wrapped by the KEM envelope.
- Transport
- TLS in transit
Defense in depth: the payload is opaque even to the tunnel.
Key custody
The custody model is the whole point: we never have the ability to decrypt poll responses.
Keypair generated in your browser
When a workspace is created, the admin's client generates the keypair locally. Private key material never transits our servers.
We store the public key only
Servers hold what respondents need to encrypt, nothing that can decrypt poll responses.
Decryption happens in your client
Aggregates are computed in the authorized admin client, after local decryption, above the k-anonymity threshold.
Lost key = lost poll response data. By design.
Individual poll responses cannot be recovered if decryption keys are lost: a vendor who can read them for you can read them without you. Admin workspace keys may offer optional server-assisted recovery (email-gated escrow); that path never restores individual response plaintext to InviziPoll.
Data handling
Where plaintext exists, class by class
The column your DPA reviewer actually wants: for each data class, where it is ever readable, and for how long we keep it.
Poll questions
Our servers (required to render ballots). Questions are authored content, not responses.
life of workspace
Individual responses
Respondent's browser only, for seconds. Persisted exclusively as ciphertext.
ciphertext · until poll deletion
Respondent identity / IP
Nowhere: never collected on ballot/respondent flows. No cookies, no fingerprinting, IPs not written to logs.
n/a (never persisted)
Aggregate results
Admin's client, computed locally after decryption, k-anonymity-gated.
not stored server-side
Account & billing data
Our servers: admin emails and billing records, like any SaaS. Kept strictly separate from response data.
life of account + legal minimum
Marketing analytics
Marketing pages only: first-party, cookieless, aggregate. Ballot pages carry zero telemetry.
See Privacy Policy
Found something? We want the report.
We run a coordinated disclosure process: report privately, we acknowledge, fix, and credit you when it ships. We don't operate a paid bug bounty yet, saying so beats implying one exists.
Reports that demonstrate any path from stored data to a readable individual response are treated as severity-critical, whatever the mechanism.
Report via or the fields in our published /.well-known/security.txt.
/.well-known/security.txt
Contact: mailto:security@invizipoll.comEncryption: /security/pgp.txtPolicy: /security#disclosurePreferred-Languages: en# acknowledge ≤ 3 business days · fix window by severity# no legal action for good-faith research
Go deeper
Check the claims against the design
Speak-up & compliance feedback
Shadow IT risk, discovery surface, and SIEM audit metadata for security-led speak-up programs — on architecture you can verify.
Speak-up solutionEncryption docs
ML-KEM-768 envelope construction, ML-DSA-65 signatures, and the client-side decryption flow, step by step.
Read encryption docsAnonymity guarantees
Why ciphertext-only storage matters, what operators can and cannot see, and the honest caveats.
Read the anonymity pagePrivacy Policy
The ZeroTelemetry posture for respondent flows, plus exactly what marketing analytics do and don't collect.
View Privacy PolicyFAQ
Employee survey encryption — common security questions
Answers for vendor assessments and architecture review. For speak-up and compliance programs, see secure speak-up feedback.
- How does InviziPoll encrypt employee surveys?
- Each response is encrypted in the respondent's browser before upload. Servers persist ciphertext only. Authorized admins decrypt aggregate analytics in their own clients using keys they control — InviziPoll operators cannot read individual plaintext answers as part of normal service delivery.
- What does ciphertext-only storage mean?
- Poll response bodies are stored as opaque encrypted blobs. There is no server-side plaintext of answers, and admin surfaces show aggregates above k-anonymity thresholds rather than individual readable submissions.
- Is InviziPoll post-quantum ready?
- Yes for the payload cryptography path documented on this page: ML-KEM-768 (FIPS 203) for key encapsulation and ML-DSA-65 (FIPS 204) for signatures, hybridized with classical primitives where the architecture requires it.
- Can InviziPoll decrypt my team's survey responses?
- No for poll response bodies. Customer-held keys decrypt aggregates in authorized admin browsers. Optional admin vault recovery paths never restore respondent plaintext to InviziPoll.
- Do you have SOC 2 or ISO 27001?
- Not yet. Rather than imply certifications we do not hold, /security publishes the architecture, threat model, and data-handling facts a vendor assessment needs so reviewers can verify claims against the design.
Bring your security questionnaire.
We'd rather answer two hundred hard questions in writing than print a badge. Send the assessment. Architecture answers included.
