Anonymous Feedback Without Anyone Reading Your Comments

01Why comment boxes come back empty

Ask anyone who's run an engagement survey and they'll tell you the same thing. The scale questions fill up. The "anything else?" box at the end comes back with a handful of answers, and they're the safe ones.

That isn't apathy. It's a sensible read of the risk. A five-point scale is one of five answers, shared with everyone who picked the same number. A paragraph is yours. It has your turns of phrase, your pet words, the incident only you were in the room for. In a team of nine, a manager who's read your Slack messages for two years doesn't need your name on it.

So people do the maths and leave it blank. Or they write something bland that's safe and useless. Either way, the thing you most wanted to hear doesn't arrive.

02What we built instead

Under every comment box on an InviziPoll poll, people get two choices: Leadership can read my words, or Only send topics, not my words.

If they choose topics, they write as much as they want, and their browser suggests topics from what they wrote. They pick up to five, from those suggestions or a short list of common ones (workload, pay, management, recognition, safety and so on), and can add a tone: positive, mixed or negative. Before they submit, they see exactly what's going: "Leadership will get: workload, scheduling · tone: negative."

Then only those topics are sent. The words are thrown away on the device. There's nothing to read later, because nothing was sent.

A few guard rails make that hold up:

• Nobody can type a topic. Picks come from the suggestions or the fixed list only, so a sentence can't sneak back in as a "topic".
• Suggestions skip anything that looks identifying. No numbers, and no words that look like a name or a place.
• Topics are counted, never shown one by one. A topic appears only once two people picked it, and the topic list for a question opens only once five people answered it that way.

03What leadership actually gets

Leadership gets a short list under the comments: how many people answered with topics, each topic at least two of them picked with its count, and the tone split. It's in the results downloads too. It never shows up in group breakdowns or shared results, because a rare topic in a small group is exactly the kind of detail that narrows things down.

Is that less than a paragraph? Yes. But it's a lot more than a blank box. "Eleven people picked workload, eight picked scheduling, mostly negative" is something you can act on. And people who'd never have written a word will often tap three topics.

04What it doesn't do

We'd rather say this plainly. The topics are decrypted in the admin's browser to be counted, so a determined, technical admin could see which topics one person picked, alongside that person's other answers. They can't ever see the words. That's the guarantee, and it's why the counting floors exist.

It also isn't a replacement for reading comments. Nothing's pre-selected: an answer is readable unless the person chooses topics. People who are happy to write still write, and you read their words in a shuffled order with no dates.

05Why this matters more than the encryption

Most of what makes InviziPoll anonymous happens out of sight: answers are encrypted in the respondent's browser and we can't read them. That's the proof. But it doesn't help the person staring at a comment box, because their worry isn't us. It's their manager reading their phrasing.

Topics-only answers a different question: "can I tell you what's wrong without you knowing it was me?" That's the question that decides whether someone writes anything at all. It's the same reason we argue anonymous and confidential aren't the same thing: a promise about who can look isn't the same as nothing there to look at.

FAQQuestions people ask