Independent directories
G2 and AlternativeTo listings are live so buyers can find InviziPoll outside our marketing site. Capterra and TrustRadius remain in progress for additional Tier-1 coverage.
Live now
InviziPoll Reviews
Proof-first posture, not fabricated ratings
InviziPoll is engineered so individual poll answers stay ciphertext on our servers. That architectural story matters more than synthetic star widgets, but we know procurement teams still look for primary-source proof they can verify independently.
No synthetic testimonialsPrimary-source artifactsG2 & AlternativeTo liveCookieless page
Illustrative list of verifiable primary-source artifacts: four live documents, G2 and AlternativeTo listings live, Capterra and TrustRadius underway, and a policy row excluding fabricated testimonials.
BLUF: Bottom line up front
What we publish, and what we refuse to fake
We don't synthesize testimonials or run a star widget we control on this marketing site. Instead we point buyers at artifacts they can verify independently, and at Tier-1 directories where verified buyers publish structured reviews tied to real deployments. The distinction is the whole point of a proof-first posture.
What we publish
- Primary-source security & encryption artifacts
- Structured reviews from verified buyers on Tier-1 directories (G2 live)
- Neutral, side-by-side vendor comparisons
What we refuse to fake
- Invented testimonials or named quotes
- A star-rating widget we score ourselves
- Paid-for ratings or incentivized reviews
How we are building public proof
Three routes to external validation
Each one is verifiable without taking our word for it. That's the bar for anything we'd call proof.
Security artifacts
Share Security & Trust, our Anonymity guarantees, and the Privacy Policy with your risk reviewers. These documents anchor every factual claim we make.
Live now
Honest comparisons
Neutral vendor pages live under Alternatives, so you can map InviziPoll against tools your teams already pay for, with strengths and trade-offs stated plainly.
Live now
Questions
What buyers ask about reviews
The honest answers, and the URLs to pair with your own questionnaire.
We do not synthesize testimonials on this marketing site. Buyers should rely on Tier-1 software directories (G2 and AlternativeTo are live) plus primary-source artifacts: Security & Trust (/security), docs on encryption, and this page's FAQs. Procurement teams pairing those URLs with their own questionnaires get the factual baseline, without a fabricated rating in the middle.
Because we can't make them verifiable. A quote we write and attribute ourselves proves nothing about how the product behaves. We'd rather send you to sources you can check independently, including the architecture, the docs, and reviews published by verified buyers on directories we don't control.
G2 (g2.com/products/invizipoll) and AlternativeTo (alternativeto.net/software/invizipoll) are live. Capterra and TrustRadius remain in progress. Primary-source artifacts on /security and related docs remain the strongest evidence independent of any directory's review count.
Send them four URLs: Security & Trust, the encryption docs, Anonymity guarantees, and the Privacy Policy. Together they cover the threat model, key custody, the ciphertext boundary, and our telemetry posture: the factual baseline a review questionnaire is meant to confirm.
A star rating is a summary you have to trust. A primary-source artifact is a claim you can independently verify. We'd rather be judged on the second, and let genuine buyer reviews accumulate where we can't edit them.
Verify for yourself
The four URLs to check our claims against
Pair these with your questionnaire. They anchor everything on this page.
Security & Trust
/security
Threat model, key custody, and breach-impact facts for vendor assessments.
Read moreEncryption docs
/docs/docs-encryption-model-overview
ML-KEM-768 envelopes, ML-DSA-65 signatures, and client-side decryption boundaries.
Read moreAnonymity
/trust/anonymity
Ciphertext-only storage and what operators cannot read from poll responses.
Read moreAlternatives
/alternatives
Neutral vendor comparisons against tools your teams already pay for.
Read moreEvaluate the architecture, not the adjective.
Pair the artifacts on this page with your own questionnaire, or start a trial and test the ciphertext boundary yourself.