Culture Amp Pricing: What the Vendor Actually Publishes

✓What we say about Culture Amp here was last verified on 2026-08-16 against Culture Amp's pricing page and Vendr's anonymised contract dataset. Prices change; re-check the linked sources at the end of this article before you build a budget on them.

01What Culture Amp publishes

The modules

Culture Amp's pricing page lists these as separately purchasable:

• Engage, for employee surveys and insights
• Perform, for performance management and development
• People Science Consulting, sold as an add-on service

You buy modules, not a single seat price, so "what does Culture Amp cost" is an underspecified question until you say which modules.

The service tiers

The page bands organisations by headcount, which is how it segments support level rather than a price break it publishes:

The stated pricing model

This is the one direct statement worth having verbatim, because it names the three variables and rules out monthly billing. Culture Amp's own FAQ states:

The same FAQ adds that all Culture Amp products are billed annually. So: per employee, per module, banded by service tier, annual only. No monthly option, and no per-employee rate is published for any band.

02What's quote-only

Every price. The pricing page carries request-a-quote and speak-to-our-team calls to action throughout and no self-service purchase path. There's no published per-employee rate, no published module price, and no published minimum contract value.

See how published pricing and browser-encrypted polling compare with Culture Amp.

03What third parties report

The most useful public benchmark is Vendr, which aggregates anonymised contracts its buyers have signed. As of its stated last update of February 2026, accessed 2026-08-16, Vendr reports for Culture Amp:

Two things make this sample more informative than the equivalent Qualtrics one. It's larger (506 contracts), and the spread is narrower (roughly 7x low to high, against 20x for Qualtrics). A narrower spread suggests a more consistent product being bought by more similar companies, which makes the median a more useful planning figure.

A note on the other "Culture Amp pricing" pages you'll find

Searching this term surfaces a lot of per-employee-per-year figures, and almost all of them sit on the blogs of companies that sell competing engagement products. Those numbers may well be accurate, but they're marketing assets from interested parties, rarely state a methodology, and several disagree with each other by a factor of two.

We are not repeating them here, because they cannot be sourced to either Culture Amp or a disclosed contract dataset. If you want a second data point beyond Vendr, ask two peer companies in your headcount band what they pay, which is a better sample than a listicle.

What we are not going to do is total a bill. Culture Amp doesn't publish a per-employee rate, so any "Culture Amp costs $X for 500 people" figure is constructed. The honest version is: the median observed contract is $21,990 per year, and your quote depends on headcount, module mix, and service tier.

04What actually changes the bill

• Headcount, which is the stated primary variable. Culture Amp is priced per employee, so growth between signature and renewal is a real budget line.
• Module mix. Engage alone and Engage plus Perform are different products at different prices. Decide whether you're buying listening or performance management before you take the call.
• Service tier. The banding above is about the level of support and people science attached, and it moves with headcount.
• People Science Consulting. It's an add-on, and it's the line most likely to be present in the upper half of Vendr's range.
• Annual billing only. There's no monthly escape hatch, so a twelve-month commitment is the minimum unit of spend.
• Contract length and renewal terms. As with any annual enterprise contract, ask what the uplift is at renewal before you take the year-one discount.

05Where InviziPoll fits, and where it doesn't

Full disclosure: we built InviziPoll, so weigh this section accordingly.

Where it doesn't fit. Culture Amp is an engagement and performance suite with a large benchmarking dataset, action planning wired into manager workflows, performance review cycles, and a people science practice attached. InviziPoll has none of that, beyond a short "You said, we did" list of up to three actions with a status on each poll. If your programme depends on external benchmarks, on manager action plans tracked over quarters, or on running reviews and engagement in one system, InviziPoll is the wrong tool and no price comparison makes it the right one.

Where it does fit. The narrow case is high-stakes questions where a confidential platform suppresses honest answers. Culture Amp is a confidential system: results are protected by reporting thresholds, and identity exists in the platform because segmentation, action planning, and lifecycle analytics require it.

That's a legitimate design, and it's not anonymity. On InviziPoll, responses are encrypted in the respondent's browser and the server stores ciphertext only, so individual answers aren't readable by InviziPoll. Nothing shows until at least the poll's minimum group size has answered (never fewer than three), a few answers are always held in reserve until the poll closes, breakdowns by group appear only after it closes and never for fewer than five, written answers come back shuffled and undated, and responses carry no timestamps.

Our prices are published at invizipoll.com/pricing.

For the feature comparison, see InviziPoll vs Culture Amp. For the anonymity question, see Is Culture Amp anonymous?, how to tell if an employee survey is anonymous, and confidential vs anonymous. For the full compare set, use the alternatives hub.

FAQQuestions people ask